Trump’s Controversial Proposal: U.S. to Take Over Gaza

GOOBJOOG NEWS|WASHINGTON: In a move that has sparked widespread criticism and global debate, U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed that the United States take control of the Gaza Strip following the ongoing Israeli military operations. Speaking at a press conference alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump suggested that the U.S. should oversee the reconstruction of Gaza and relocate its Palestinian population to neighboring countries.

Trump’s proposal, which he framed as a long-term solution to instability in the region, includes the removal of unexploded ordnance, the demolition of damaged infrastructure, and the development of new housing and economic zones.

The plan has been met with sharp opposition from several international actors. Arab nations, including Egypt and Jordan, have strongly rejected the idea, warning that it could further inflame tensions and undermine regional security. The Palestinian Authority has also denounced the proposal, labeling it as an extension of Israeli occupation rather than a genuine peace initiative.

Within the U.S., political figures from both the Democratic and Republican parties have criticized Trump’s remarks, with some calling them impractical and diplomatically reckless. Analysts argue that forcibly relocating Gaza’s population would violate international law and exacerbate the ongoing humanitarian crisis.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has welcomed Trump’s stance, describing it as a “bold vision” that aligns with Israel’s security interests. However, Israeli media reports indicate that not all government officials share Netanyahu’s enthusiasm, with some questioning the feasibility of such a plan.

The proposal comes at a time when ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas remain fragile, and humanitarian agencies continue to warn of the dire situation faced by Gaza’s civilians.

As the international community reacts, it remains to be seen whether Trump’s suggestion will gain traction or be dismissed as political rhetoric. What is certain, however, is that his remarks have added a new layer of complexity to an already volatile situation in the Middle East.